Disposed

S.V.J. Kalathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC21 Oct 2021CRP/2250/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, directed the Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, to number and dispose of a pending payment-out petition regarding land acquisition compensation fixity sum within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, to number the pending payment-out petition and dispose of the matter on merits within one month.

S.V.J. Kalathi Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 21.10.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021
S.V.J.Kalathi ... Petitioner
versus
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Taluk Office Road,
Ponneri.
2.Union of India,
Represented by the Secretary
to Government,
Department of Space,
Antariksh Bhavan,
New Bel Road,
Bangalore - 560 094.
3.The Chief Construction Engineer,
Department of Space,
Sriharikota - 524 124. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to issue necessary direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, to dispose of the payment-out petition filed by the petitioner bearing I.A.SR.No.1861 of 2021 in L.A.O.P.No.59 of 1985 pending on its file by fixing a time limit.

¶8

1/4

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶10

C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Subramanian For Respondents : Dr.S.Suriya Government Advocate (CS)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking direction to the

¶14

learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, to dispose of the payment-out petition filed by the petitioner in I.A.SR.No.1861 of 2021 in L.A.O.P.No.59

¶15

of 1985, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶16

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, this

¶17

Court fixed a sum of Rs.110/- per cent for the lands acquired from the petitioner. The difference between the amount fixed by the Subordinate Court and this Court had been deposited to the credit of L.A.O.P.No.59 of 1985. The amount deposited is Rs.1,61,427/-. The petitioner had already withdrawn the original compensation amount ordered. Now, this difference amount is available in the Court deposit. When the petitioner filed I.A.SR.No.1861 of 2021 for issuing cheque for this amount, this petition is

¶18

kept pending, without assigning any number. Therefore, the present petition.

¶19

2/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶21

C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021

¶22

3. L.A.O.P. was filed in the year 1985. The amount of

¶23

Rs.1,61,427/- was deposited in the Court to the credit of L.A.O.P.No.59 of 1985. This amount is due to the petitioner. Therefore, the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, is directed to number the petition filed for payment-out, if it is otherwise in order and dispose the matter, on merits and

¶24

in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a

¶25

period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With this observation, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs.
21.10.2021
Speaking order / Non-speaking order
Index : Yes / No
Note : Issue Order Copy on 25.10.2021
sri

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶29

C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021

¶30

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

¶31

sri

¶32

¶33

1.The Subordinate Judge,
Tiruvallur.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Taluk Office Road,
Ponneri.
3.Union of India,
Represented by the Secretary to Government,
Department of Space,
Antariksh Bhavan,
New Bel Road,
Bangalore - 560 094.
C.R.P. (NPD) No.2250 of 2021
4.The Chief Construction Engineer,
Department of Space,
Sriharikota - 524 124.

¶34

21.10.2021

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

S.V.J. Kalathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.V.J. Kalathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Maragatham Vs U.Suman Latha Metha

P. Mylsamy Vs Ponnusamy

Muniyan Vs Vasanthakumari

Ragunathan Vs Nageswaran

S.Thanigachalam, Vs M.Perumal

Balaraman (Died), Vs Nemichand (Died)