In a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India setting aside a decree from the Small Causes Court, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the subject matter had ceased to exist.
Civil Revision Petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (NPD) No.188 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
CRP (NPD) No.188 of 2019
and
CMP.No.1513 of 2019
S.L.Sakthivel Raja ... Petitioner / Respondent
Vs.
D.Ravikumar ...Respondent / Petitioner
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the Decree and Judgment in Transfer O.P.No.159 of 2018, dated 20.09.2018, passed by the Chief Justice, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Hemavathi For Respondent : M/s.Rank Associates
O R D E R
(This case has been heard through video conference)
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner. It is
stated that the prayer sought in this revision petition has become infructuous
and hence nothing survives for adjudication in this case.
1/2
CRP (NPD) No.188 of 2019
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
ssi
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the
revision petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No
order as to costs.
19.04.2021
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
ssi
To
1.The Chief Justice, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
CRP (NPD) No.188 of 2019 and
CMP.No.1513 of 2019
2/2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S.L. Sakthivel Raja
D. Ravikumar
C. V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
