Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous because the underlying appeal was disposed of on 13.07.2017 prior to the filing of the revision petition on 11.08.2021.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD).No.1837 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRP (PD).No.1837 of 2018
Muthaian ...Petitioner
Vs
Subbammal (died)
1. Marathal
2. Pachiammal ..Respondents
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 13.07.2017 made in I.A.No.194/2014 in A.S.No.18/2013 on the file of V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed
1/ 3
CRP (PD).No.1837 of 2018
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner would state that this
revision petition has been preferred against the order passed in an Interlocutory Application in the Appeal Suit, which was pending before the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. He further submitted that the appeal itself was disposed of on 13.07.2017 and hence, the prayer sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. In the light of the above submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 11.08.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order pvs
To The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
2/ 3
CRP (PD).No.1837 of 2018
K.KALYANASUNDARAM.J.
pvs
CRP (PD).No.1837 of 2018
11.08.2021
3/ 3
Muthaian
Subbammal
Marathal
Pachiammal
K.Kalynasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
