Dhanalakshmi v. Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused to remand an injunction dispute for disposal, noting the underlying suit has been pending for six years. The Court directed the Trial Court to dispose of the main suit on merits within three months to expedite the matter.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Trial Court to dispose of the underlying suit on merits within three months. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
CRP(PD)No.1766 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 22.12.2020 PRONOUNCED ON : 09.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
CRP(PD)No.1766 of 2016
CMP.No.9342 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
1. Dhanalakshmi
2. Mani Petitioners
Vs
1. Rani
2. Tamilselvan
3. Santhi
4. Ganesan
5. Vijayalakshmi
6. Balamurugan Respondents
Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decreetal order, dated 29.03.2016, passed in IA.No.105 of 2016 in IA.No.153 of 2014 in OS.No.43 of 2014, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthiramerur.
- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order and decreetal order, dated 29.03.2016, passed in IA.No.105 of 2016 in IA.No.153 of 2014 in OS.No.43 of 2014, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
CRP(PD)No.1766 of 2016
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the order dismissing an injunction application filed ex parte due to alleged oversight in filing the counter.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should allow the application to be contested or dispose of the split matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dhanalakshmi and others
- respondent
Rani and others
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court