Padmavathy v. Karthikeyan
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition challenging an order that dismissed a request to amend a plaint. The court held the amendment would change the suit nature and cause prejudice, upholding the lower court decision.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed with no costs and the connected MP was closed.
What the court decided
CRP(PD)No.1743 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 22.12.2020 PRONOUNCED ON : 20.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
CRP(PD)No.1743 of 2016
CMP.No.9253 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
Padmavathy Petitioner
Vs
1. Karthikeyan
2. Thilagavati Respondents
Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated, 08.03.2016, passed in IA.No.504 of 2013 in OS.No.141 of 2010, by the District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Franklin For Respondent : No appearance ORDER
- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order dated, 08.03.2016, passed in IA.No.504 of 2013 in OS.No.141 of 2010, by the District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam.
- The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the Plaintiff is the Petitioner herein and the Defendants are the Respondents herein. The suit was filed for permanent injunction, restraining the Defendants from continuing their
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition seeking to set aside the order declining amendment of plaint should be allowed.
Whether the proposed amendment changes the nature and character of the suit and causes prejudice to defendants.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Padmavathy
- respondent
Karthikeyan
- respondent
Thilagavati
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court