Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

P.Ganesan Vs G.Balasubramanian — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
P.Ganesan Vs G.BalasubramanianP.Ganesan v. G.Balasubramanian

Dismissed

P.Ganesan v. G.Balasubramanian

Madras HC1 Nov 2021CRP/1661/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition treated as infructuous after suit partly decreed earlier; petition dismissed and connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

C.R.P.(PD).No.1661 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

C.R.P.(PD).No.1661 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.9070 of 2018

1.P.Ganesan

2.P.Kanniappan

3.Lakshmi

4.Shanthi

5.Silsa

.. Petitioners

Vs.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
P.Ganesan
petitioner
P.Kanniappan
petitioner
Lakshmi
petitioner
Shanthi
petitioner
Silsa
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 1 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 8 May 2018
Case no.: CRP/1661/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V.m.velumani

Sheik Maricar Vs Vijakumari
29 Oct 2021
R.Ramalingam Vs L.Mythili(died)
29 Oct 2021
Hirachand Vs V.M. Muthukumar
29 Oct 2021
Muniratham Vs Amirthammal @ Ponnammal
1 Nov 2021
Gowtham Sampath Vs Gurdip Singh Sandhu

Cite this judgement

P.Ganesan v. G.Balasubramanian, CRP/1661/2018 (MAD), decided on 1 November 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V.M.Velumani

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition filed to set aside an order and decree became infructuous as the underlying suit was partly decreed on 28.02.2019 with nothing surviving. The petition was dismissed accordingly, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No costs.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1.G.Balasubramanian

2.Nagamma

3.Kutty

4.G.Venkatesan

5.Rajeswari

6.V.Chandrasekara

7.V.Gunasekaran

8.Valliammal

9.Anjalai

10.V.Kanniappan

11.V.Sekar

12.V.Kumar

13.Chellamma @ Chellam

14.Dhanalakshmi

15.N.Murugesh Naicker

16.N.Chellan @ Selvaraj

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/4

C.R.P.(PD).No.1661 of 2018

17.Munian 18.Chandra

.. Respondents

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decree dated 06.04.2017 made in I.A.No.1438 of 2017 in O.S.No.1872 of 2011 on the file of the V

Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Annakkodi for M/s.R.Vijayaraghaven

For Respondents : Mr.R.Thirugnanam (For RR2 to 4)

No appearance (For R8, 14 & 15)

O R D E R

(The matter is heard through 'video conferencing/hybrid mode')

Mr.R.Thirugnanam, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4 submitted that the suit itself was partly decreed on 28.02.2019 and

nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also submitted the same.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

C.R.P.(PD).No.1661 of 2018

2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on both

sides, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

01.11.2021

Index :: Yes/No gsa

To The V Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(PD).No.1661 of 2018

V.M.VELUMANI, J.

gsa

C.R.P.(PD)No.1661 of 2018

01.11.2021

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Balasubramanian

Coram

AI extract

V.M.Velumani

CNR

HCMA010378692018

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

1 Nov 2021

Banumathi, Vs Saraswathi,W/O.Anandan

1 Nov 2021