The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 seeking to number an unnumbered application. The court held that the petitioners failed to furnish the SR or 19R number of the alleged application, which was a necessary condition for issuing directions.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.7775 of 2017
1.Rasayal
2.Ukravel
3.Amudha
4.Jayalakshmi .. Petitioners
Vs.
1.Pandurangan
2.Pakkirisami
3.Thangasami
4.Pushpam
5.Vridhambal
6.Kaliaperumal
7.Ramakrishnan
8.Pachamuthu Pillai
9.Palani Pillai .. Respondents
1/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to number the unnumbered application dated 02.02.2015 in I.A.No. Nil of 2015 in Cud.SOS.No.681 of 1978 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti.
For R1 : Not ready in notice
For RR 2, 3, 5 to 7, 9 : Died
For RR 4 & 8 : No appearance
O R D E R
(The matter is heard through “Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode”.)
This Civil Revision Petition is filed to number the unnumbered
application dated 02.02.2015 in I.A.No. Nil of 2015 in Cud.SOS.No.681 of 1978 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti.
2.The petitioners have come out with the present Civil Revision
Petition for a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Panruti, to number the un-numbered application filed in O.S.No.681 of 1978. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that when the petitioners have
filed copy application for obtaining copy of the affidavit and petition filed by
them, the same was returned with the following endorsement:
2/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
“The mentioned petition was not numbered
because the case records was not received today. Unnumbered petition with notes order cannot be given. Hence this CA returned.”
3.From the materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioners
have not furnished any SR Number / Diary Number / 19R Number for having filed the application. According to petitioners, the said application was filed on 02.12.2015, but they have not furnished any SR Number / Diary Number /
19R Number to show that the said application alleged to have been filed on 02.12.2015. Without furnishing any details by the petitioners, no direction
can be issued to the learned Judge to number the application.
4.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
07.10.2021
krk
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
3/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
V.M.VELUMANI, J. krk
To
The learned Subordinate Judge, Panruti.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1659 of 2017
07.10.2021
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 for numbering an unnumbered application can be entertained without the petitioners furnishing the SR/19R/ Diary Number of the application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rasayal, Ukravel, Amudha, Jayalakshmi
Pandurangan, Pakkirisami, Thangasami, Pushpam, Vridhambal, Kaliaperumal, Ramakrishnan, Pachamuthu Pillai, Palani Pillai
V.M.Velumanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
