P.Kuppusamy v. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Madras dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the counsel for petitioners submitted that no further adjudication was required.
High Court of Madras dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the counsel for petitioners submitted that no further adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(NPD).No.1486 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.10.2021
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1486 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.P.Kuppusamy
2.C.Chithambaram
3.Paramasivam ...Petitioners
Vs
1.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,
Coimbatore Region,
Rep. by its Authorised Signatory
2.V.Chinnanan
3.C.Selvi
4.K.Ponnusamy
5.Jayammal ... Respondents
Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 19.01.2015 made in
E.P.No.49 of 2014 in SCUT Arb. Case No.296 of 2012, wherein the learned I
Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode, allowed the petition under Order XXI,
Rule 48, r/w. Section 151 CPC and directed that Rs.3,000/-, Rs.7,000/- and
Rs.3,000/- shall be deducted from the salary of the petitioners respectively.
For Petitioners : Mr.Anirudh
for Mr.A.R.Palanisamy
For Respondents : No Appearance
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J.
1/2
CRP(NPD).No.1486 of 2015
r st
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today i.e (06.10.2021),
Mr.Anirudh, learned representing counsel for Mr.A.R.Palanisamy, learned
counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous and
hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the Civil Revision Petition.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the
petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
06.10.2021
Index: Yes
Internet:Yes
Speaking order/Non Speaking Order
rst
To:
The I Additional Subordinate Judge,
Erode.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1486 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Kuppusamy
C.Chithambaram
Paramasivam
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
V.Chinnanan
C.Selvi
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court