M.Nagaraj v. P.Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous because the underlying rent control appeal was already disposed of, rendering no legal error survivable.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
CRP.NPD.No.1240 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP (NPD) No.1240 of 2018
and
CMP.No.6347 of 2018
M.Nagaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
P.Ramachandran ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu
Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960, to set aside the order dated
12.02.2018 in I.A.No.13 of 2018 in R.C.A.No.25 of 2012 on the file of the
learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah
For Respondent : Mr.K.Sudhakar
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is directed as against the fair and decretal order dated 12.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.13 of 2018 in R.C.A.No.25 of 2012 on the file of the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Nagaraj
- respondent
P.Ramachandran
Coram
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court