The petitioner withdrew the Civil Revision Petition. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition consequent upon withdrawal without any costs.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.10.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P.NO.104 OF 2019
D.Ramesh ... Petitioner .Vs.
M.Subburaya Choudry (Died) 1. Smt.Kumutha 2. S.Geetha 3. S.Venkatesan 4. Chitra ... Respondents
PRAYER:Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order and decreetal order in E.A.No.79 of 2016 in E.P.No.107 of 2013 in O.S.No.129 of 2003, on the file of District Munsif Court, Tambaram dated 21.06.2018.
For Petitioner : Ms.Arul Yazhini For Mr.V.Raghavachari
O R D E R
The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he received instructions to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and a letter addressed to the Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court of Madras is produced.
2. Recording the submission made by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and also on going through the letter seeking withdrawal of this Civil Revision Petition, the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ay/ep To
The District Munsif, Tambaram.
+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari , Advocate, S.R.No.51059
C.R.P.NO.104 OF 2019
RLD(CO) PBS/25/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Ramesh
Smt.Kumutha
S.Geetha
S.Venkatesan
Chitra
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
