23. Now, coming to the quantum of punishment awarded by the Courts below, as already observed, due to the attitude committed by the Investigating Officer of this case, the petitioners are not in a position to calculate the outstanding dues liable to be received by them and also the amount, which has to be paid to the depositors. Therefore, the Investigating Agency itself has closed the door for settlement. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that, to meet the ends of justice, reducing the sentence awarded by the Court below alone is sufficient to dispose the appeal. Therefore, the sentence of Rigorous Imprisonment of 2 years for the offence under Section 5 of TNPID Act awarded by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in Crl.A.No.121 of 2012 dated 21.06.2012 to the petitioners is modified to the extent of 6 months instead of 2 years and the same was ordered to set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Since the petitioners / accused are in bail, they shall undergo the remaining period of sentence, if any. Fine amount, if any paid is directed to be adjusted.
