P.Ramesh v. Gowri @ Anuradha
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision filed under Cr.P.C. to set aside an order was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was consistently absent from court hearings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Crl.R.C.No.929 of 2014
and M.P.No.1 of 2014
P.Ramesh S/o.Pandurangan Naicker ... Petitioner Vs. Gowri @ Anuradha W/o.P.Ramesh ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records relating to the order dated 30.07.2014 made in M.C.No.30 of 2013 on the file of the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Chennai and set aside the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance O R D E R
This criminal Revision has been filed to call for the records relating to the order dated 30.07.2014 made in M.C.No.30 of 2013 on the file of the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Chennai and set aside the same as illegal.
- This Criminal Revision Case is of the year 2014. On an earlier occasion, when the matter was taken up for consideration by this Court on 10.02.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” after two weeks. Accordingly, again when the matter was listed on 03.03.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be listed under the same caption “for dismissal” today, i.e., on 08.03.2021. Even today, i.e., 08.03.2021, when the matter is taken up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Ramesh
- respondent
Gowri @ Anuradha
Coram
A.A.NAkKiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court