Allowed

Kanagalingam v. State Rep.by

Madras HC2 Dec 2021CRL RC/828/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a criminal revision petition seeking interim custody of a seized vehicle. The petitioner, not being an accused, applied for the vehicle's release as it was exposed to weather. The court set aside the lower court's order, granted custody subject to a non-refundable deposit of Rs.50,000 and conditions to produce the vehicle in confiscation proceedings if initiated.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed; order of Judicial Magistrate II, Alandur set aside; interim custody of the vehicle granted to petitioner subject to deposit of Rs.50,000 and conditions.

Kanagalingam Vs State Rep.by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2021)

i m p l i

a t i

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶8

DATED : 02.12.2021

CORAM:

o f

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Revision Case No.828 of 2021

¶14

t h

¶15

¶16

Kanagalingam ... Petitioner

¶17

s e r i o u s

¶18

..Vs..

¶19

State, Represented by, The Inspector of Police, J-12, Kanathur Police Station. (Crime No.37/2021) ... Respondent

¶20

n a t u r e

¶21

o f

¶22

PRAYER : Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.1388 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II, Alandur dated 11.10.2021, set aside the same and direct the respondent to release the petitioner's vehicle Goods Carrier (H), Reg.No.TN12 AD 2378, Engine No.4SPCR11KRY658535, Chasis No.MAT50267J8K29212 to the petitioner.

¶23

c r i m i n a l

¶24

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sengkodi

¶25

For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶26

p r 1/7 o c https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis e e d

¶27

O R D E R

¶28

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶29

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed against the dismissal of the petition seeking return of property.

¶30

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of Goods Carrier (H), Reg.No.TN12 AD 2378, Engine No.4SPCR11KRY658535, Chasis No.MAT50267J8K29212. She would submit that without the knowledge of the petitioner, the vehicle was used by the employees for illicit transport of tobacco products in respect of which the respondent has registered a case in Crime No.37 of 2021 under Section 7 and 20(2) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act 2003 and Section 328 of IPC. She would further submit that the petitioner is not an accused. The vehicle has been seized and it is now in the custody of the respondent police. She would further submit that the vehicle is kept in open space exposing to vagaries of weather and thereby, the value of the vehicle is deteriorating day by day. She would submit that the petitioner is unable to put the vehicle to use and the petitioner is suffering and also incurring

¶31

2/7

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶34

heavy financial loss. She would submit that the petitioner would abide by any stringent conditions to be imposed by this Court and he would be prepared to produce the vehicle before the respondent or before the concerned court as and when required by the Court. She would further submit that the petition filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Alandur was dismissed on 11.10.2021 stating that the investigation is pending.

¶35

4.Mr.S.Sugendran, learned Government Advocate (Crl side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner vehicle involved in Crime No.37/2021 for the offences under Section 7 and 20(2) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act 2003 read with Section 328 of IPC. He would submit that the investigation is pending. He would further submit that the petitioner is not an accused in this case. The other accused have been arrested and enlarged on bail.

¶36

Heard the learned counsels on both sides and perused the materials

¶37

on record.

¶38

3/7

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶41

6.Taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioner is not an

¶42

accused in this case and that the vehicle is parked in open exposure to vagaries of weather, this Court is inclined to grant interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

¶43

In view of the above, the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur in Crl.M.P.No.1388 of 2021 dated 11.10.2021 stands set aside and the criminal revision petition stands allowed. The interim custody

¶44

of the vehicle is directed to be handed over to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶45

(i)The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of

¶46

the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership and the learned Magistrate, on perusal of the RC book and other records, retaining the Xerox copy of the same, shall return the original documents to the petitioner with a view to use the vehicle;

¶47

4/7

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶50

(ii)The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner till confiscation proceedings is over;

¶51

(iii)The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only), as nonrefundable deposit through RTGS/NEFT in favour of the Joint Secretary & Treasurer, Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance (CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009, Tamil Nadu, India, e- mail: [email protected] or by Electronic Clearing System (ECS) to Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai 600 009, S.B.Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFS Code IOBA0001172, CMPRF PAN: AAAGC0038F and on such payment and production of proof, the vehicle shall be returned;

¶52

(iv)The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and also to produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent or the Court below as well as by the District Collector of the District or authorized officer in that behalf by the Government;

¶53

5/7

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶56

(v)The petitioner shall participate in the confiscation proceedings, if any initiated, and shall produce the vehicle, before the confiscation authority. This order is subjected to the confiscation proceedings.

¶57

02.12.2021

¶58

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vri/shk

¶59

¶60

1. Judicial Magistrate-II, Alandur

¶61

2. The Inspector of Police, J-12, Kanathur Police Station.

¶62

3.The Public Prosecutor (Crl side), High Court, Madras.

¶63

4.The Record Keeper, High Court, Madras.

¶64

6/7

¶65

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶66

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶67

7/7

¶68

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶69

Crl.R.C.No.828 of 2021

¶70

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J., vri/shk

¶71

Crl. RC. No.828 of 2021

¶72

02.12.2021

¶73

8/7

¶74

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kanagalingam v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanagalingam v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sathish Vs P.Arunachalam

K. Shoban Raj Vs S.Swaminathan

Kamalanadhan Vs Tmt. Bharathi

Jagatheeswaran Vs N.Eswaramoorthy

Latha Vs K.a.Letha

Alagu Vs the State Rep by