The High Court at Madras dismissed the criminal revision and connected miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, recording an endorsement to that effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.R.C.No.802 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015
Syed Mohamed
... Petitioner/Appellant
Versus
1.Asha Parveen
2.Minor Sipana Yasmin ... Respondent/Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in M.C.No.9 of 2013, dated 01.10.2014 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur, as confirmed by the Learned Mahila Judge, Ooty in Crl.A.No.32 of 2014, dated 30.12.2014.
For Petitioner : M/s.D.Kalaiselvi
For Respondent : No Appearance
ORDER
M/s. D.Kalaiselvi, Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the said endorsement, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
klt
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur. 2.The Mahila Judge, Ooty.
Crl.R.C.No.802 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015
VG-II(CO) CB(04/01/2022)
Syed Mohamed
1.Asha Parveen
2.Minor Sipana Yasmin
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
