The High Court of Madras heard a criminal revision petition filed to set aside an order by a Judicial Magistrate. The court observed that the matter had been settled out of court based on the petitioner's counsel. Consequently, the criminal revision petition was dismissed.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed as the matter was settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.423 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.S.R. Rajendran
2.A. Rathinam
3.M. Velu .. Petitioner
Vs. Usharani .. Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in M.C.No.5 of 2013 dated 03.12.2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chidambaram.
For Petitioners : Mr.R. Sagadevan
For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the criminal revision petition is dismissed as settled out of Court. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chidambaram.
Crl.R.C.No.423 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
LN(CO) SP(19/07/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision petition filed to set aside a Magistrate's order should be allowed when the parties have settled the matter out of court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
1.S.R. Rajendran 2.A. Rathinam 3.M. Velu
Usharani
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
