Disposed

K.Mohammed Rizwan, v. M/S.Hamdaan Leathers

Madras HC28 Jun 2021CRL RC/327/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Madras addressed four criminal revision petitions where counsels for petitioner were absent. Noting trial completion, defendant absconding, and infructuousness of below rulings, the court closed the revisions and connected miscellaneous petitions, directing trial courts to proceed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal revisions in Crl.R.Cs 327, 328, 329, 330 of 2017 stand closed; connected Crl.M.Ps. are closed; trial court directed to proceed.

K.Mohammed Rizwan, Vs M/S.Hamdaan Leathers — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.06.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.327 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.3130 of 2017 and Crl.R.C.No.328 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.3131 of 2017 and Crl.R.C.No.329 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.3132 of 2017 and Crl.R.C.No.330 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.3133 of 2017

¶6

K.Mohammed Rizwan

¶7

... Petitioner in all Crl.R.Cs

¶8

.. Vs ..

¶9

M/s.Hamdaan Leathers, Rep.by its Prop.K.Nahid Afroze, No.15/3, Chandamiyan Kollai 2nd Street, NMZ Apartment, Ambur. ....Respondent in all Crl.R.Cs

¶10

Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.327 of 2017:- Criminal Revision filed under 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in C.M.P.No.5585 of 2016 in C.C.No.85 of 2013 dated 9.2.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District in so far as dismissing the petition filed under Section 243 of Cr.P.C read with 43 of Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed cheque to expert opinion pending trial in C.C.No.85/2013 on the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District.

¶11

Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.328 of 2017:- Criminal Revision filed under 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in C.M.P.No.5586 of 2016 in C.C.No.86 of 2013 dated 9.2.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District in so far as dismissing the petition filed under Section 243 of Cr.P.C read with 43 of Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed cheque to expert opinion pending trial in C.C.No.86/2013 on the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.329 of 2017:- Criminal Revision filed under 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in C.M.P.No.5583 of 2016 in C.C.No.83 of 2013 dated 9.2.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District in so far as dismissing the petition filed under Section 243 of Cr.P.C read with 43 of Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed cheque to expert opinion pending trial in C.C.No.83/2013 on the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District.

¶14

Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.330 of 2017:- Criminal Revision filed under 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in C.M.P.No.5584 of 2016 in C.C.No.84 of 2013 dated 9.2.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District in so far as dismissing the petition filed under Section 243 of Cr.P.C read with 43 of Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed cheque to expert opinion pending trial in C.C.No.84/2013 on the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District.

¶15

For Petitioner : No appearance in all Crl.R.Cs For Respondent : Mr.M.Premkumar in all Crl.R.Cs

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent in all the revision cases.

¶17

The learned counsel for the respondent/complainant contended that in respect of Crl.R.C.No.329/2017 in C.C.No.83 of 2013, already trial is over and the conviction has been laid and the accused has preferred the revision and hence, this revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶18

In all the other 3 cases namely Crl.R.C.Nos.327,328 and 330 of 2017 as against very same complainant, and the accused, trial is completed and questioning of the accused is also over.

¶19

After hearing both sides, it is seen that respondent is absconding. Hence Non-Bailable Warrant was issued.

¶20

In view of the subsequent events, I find that nothing survives in the criminal revisions and criminal revisions in Crl.R.C.Nos.327, 328 and 330 of 2017 stand closed. It is open to

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

the trial Court to proceed with the respective cases in accordance with law. Consequently, connected Crl.M.Ps. are closed.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

nvi

¶27

¶28

The Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District.

¶29

+4cc to Mr.Premkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.29854, 29855, 29856, 29857, 29857

¶30

¶31

KV(CO) SB(03/08/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Mohammed Rizwan, v. M/S.Hamdaan Leathers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Mohammed Rizwan, v. M/S.Hamdaan Leathers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palaniammal and 2 Others Vs Subbaraya Gounder

K.Palanisamy @ Palaniyappan Vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

K.Sundar Raj Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

The State of Tamilnadu Rep Vs R.Narasinga Rao(Died)

Bhuvaneswaran Vs State by

N.Manivanna Sudevan Vs S.Kotravel Murugan