5.The marriage between the parties are not in dispute and the fact that both the parties are living separately also not disputed. The respondent/wife has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the VI Additional Family Court, Chennai seeking a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month as maintenance. The learned Judge after considering the fact that the petitioner is drawing a salary of Rs.60,000/- per month and respondent has no means to maintain herself, has awarded a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month to the petitioner as maintenance which is very reasonable. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the respondent has got sufficient means to maintain herself, no documents have been filed to prove the same. It is well settled proposition of law that this Court while exercising the revisional jurisdiction, cannot sit in the arm chair of the Appellate Court and reappreciate the entire evidence. On a reading of entire materials on record, it is seen that the petitioner has not established that the respondent has got sufficient means to maintain herself, whereas the respondent established her case. This Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Court below.
