Dr.R.Solomon, M/Aged 78 Yrs v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC4 Aug 2021CRL RC/1/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., the petitioner challenged the status of a police inquiry regarding fund mishandling. The government advocate submitted that the investigation was completed and the FIR closed, resulting in the closure of the revision petition without a substantive order. A reading of this judgment reveals that the regulatory order did not decide the

What the court decided

AI extract

Dr.R.Solomon, M/Aged 78 Yrs Vs the Superintendent of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.08.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.1 of 2015

¶6

Dr.R.Solomon

¶7

... Petitioner/Respondent-1

¶8

.. Vs ..

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ....Respondents/Complainant

¶11

Prayer :- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records of the second respondent in Crime No.522 of 2014 dated 24.10.2014 set aside the same and direct the second respondent to register F.I.R against the accused as per the complaints given by the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mrs.Anitha For M/s.S.Ramasamy Law Associates

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent contended that in respect of certain mishandling of funds relating to C.S.I. Christ Church, Hosur, the revision petitioner has given a complaint to the respondent police and the respondent police has issued C.S.R.No.442/2013 and C.S.R.No.104/2013 before the Hosur Town Police Station and subsequently, F.I.R was registered in Crime No.522/2014 for alleged offence under Section 107 of Cr.P.C and accordingly, challenging the same, he has filed the criminal revision.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that after investigation, F.I.R was closed and hence nothing survives in this revision. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

nvi

¶21

¶22

The Superintendent of Police, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶23

The Inspector of Police, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶24

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.

¶25

Crl.R.C.No.1 of 2015

¶26

VG-II(CO) CB(23/08/2021)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.R.Solomon, M/Aged 78 Yrs v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dr.R.Solomon, M/Aged 78 Yrs v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Regsalin Vs N.Nagarajan

C.Dayalan Vs the State Rep. by

K.Kalaiselvi Vs D.Suresh

Gau Raksha Dal - Tamil Nadu Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Bharathi Vs the Revenue Divisional Office

S.Ganesh @ Ganesh Rao Chavan Vs N.Rashmi @ Lakshmi Gore