Criminal revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of CrPC was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite hearing via video conference.
The criminal revision case stands dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRL.R.C.NO.1141 OF 2015
P.Gajendran
.. Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER :
Petition filed under Section 397 & 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.N.3/495/2006 dated 26.07.2006 confirmed in appeal No.256/2006 by the appellate authority on 24.07.2015 and set aside the said orders.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents: Mr. R. Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate R1 to R3
O R D E R
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the criminal revision case stands dismissed for default.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To
Crl.R.C.No.1141 of 2015
SRII(CO) PM/12/10/2021
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Gajendran
Deputy Commissioner of Civil Supplies
Assistant Commissioner of Civil Supplies
Inspector of Police
Public Prosecutor
TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
