Allowed

Gnanamuthu Joseph.S v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Jul 2021CRL OP(MD)/9557/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case alleging public mischief and assault. The court dismissed the government's opposition regarding incomplete investigation since the injured party was discharged, subjecting the petitioner to specific conditions of release and reporting.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail on execution of a bond with two sureties and strict conditions of daily reporting and non-absconding.

Gnanamuthu Joseph.S Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD) No.9557 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/07/2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD)No.9557 of 2021

¶7

S.Gnanamuthu Joseph ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not known

¶8

¶9

The State rep.by

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶11

Crime.No.379/2021. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.G.GHOUSE KHATHIRI, Advocate.

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.M.MUTHMANIKKAM, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶15

PRAYER :-

¶16

For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.379 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(2)IPC in Crime No.379 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 11.07.2021, at about 06.30 pm., the defacto complainant visited his garden and found that one Joseph allowed his goats to graze in his thottam. When he asked him why he allowed his goats to graze in his thottam, the accused scolded him in filthy language and hit him with iron rod. Therefore, he suffered injuries. Hence, the complaint.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/3

¶22

CRL OP(MD) No.9557 of 2021

¶23

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶24

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police opposed this petition on the ground that investigation is not completed. However, he submitted that the injured person had been discharged from the hospital.

¶25

5.Considering the nature of incident and the fact that the injured person had been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶26

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶27

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶28

[b] the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders.

¶29

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶30

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶31

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action

¶32

2/3

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.9557 of 2021

¶34

against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶35

[ f ]If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶36

sd/20/07/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶37

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶38

¶39

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, MANAMADURAI.

¶40

2.DO THROUGH CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶41

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶42

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶43

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9557 of 2021 Date :20/07/2021

¶44

SA/VS/SAR.4/23.07.2021/3P/5C

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

3/3

Gnanamuthu Joseph.S v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gnanamuthu Joseph.S v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Pandian Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

M.Pandian Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Ibrahim Vs The Inspector of Police

Selvam Vs The Forest Range Officer

Yovan Rajadurai Vs The Inspector of Police

Premkumar Vs The Inspector of Police