Allowed

Soodamani v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jun 2021CRL OP(MD)/7420/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, accused of murder, considering the completion of investigation and the period of incarceration. The court imposed strict reporting and non-tampering conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with own bond of Rs.10,000/ and subsequent bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions and daily reporting.

Soodamani Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD)No.7420 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 08/06/2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD)No.7420 of 2021

¶7

Soodamani ... Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶8

Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, Tenkasi District. Crime No.113 of 2021.

¶9

... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar, Advocate.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.113 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner, who was arrested on 01.04.2021 for the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC in Crime No.113 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the deceased are brothers. The deceased had illegal intimacy with the wife of the petitioner and when the same was questioned by the petitioner, there was an issue arose between them. Due to that motive, the petitioner said to have dropped a big cement stone on the head of the deceased, when he was sleeping, at about 12.30 hours, on 01.04.2021 at Vadakkuvaselvi Amman Kovil Varanda. Due to the head injuries, he died. Hence, the complaint.

¶17

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.04.2021 and hence, he seeks bail for the petitioner.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD)No.7420 of 2021

¶21

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed this petition. However, he would submit that the investigation in this case has been completed and final report also filed and it was taken cognizance in PRC.No.8 of 2021 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam.

¶22

5.Taking note of the fact that the investigation in this case is completed and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶23

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) before the Jail Authority. The petitioner after his release shall surrender before the concerned Judicial Magistrate voluntarily on any working day within a period of one month from the date of resumption of regular work in the Subordinate Courts and execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, Tenkasi District. On such execution of bond before the concerned Magistrate, the own bond executed before the Jail Authority shall stand cancelled automatically.

¶24

i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶25

(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders.

¶26

iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness.

¶27

iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

¶28

v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶29

vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶30

sd/-

¶31

08/06/2021

¶32

/ TRUE COPY / / /2021

¶33

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶34

2/3

¶35

CRL OP(MD)No.7420 of 2021

¶36

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶37

TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGULAM, TENKASI DISTRICT. 2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7420 of 2021 Date :08/06/2021 GNS MS/PN/SAR-3/08.06.2021/3P.6C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

3/3

Soodamani v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soodamani v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vimal Vs The Inspector of Police

P.Mahendran @ Mahendra Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Govindasamy(mani) @ Govindasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Marimuthu Vs The Inspector of Police

Muneeswaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Vijayaragavan Vs The Inspector of Police