Dismissed

Prince @ Rajith Prince v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Jun 2021CRL OP(MD)/7174/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC. The High Court rejected the prayer, holding that there was no change of circumstances since the earlier anticipatory bail petition filed by the same petitioners was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail in Crime No.99 of 2021 was denied due to no change in circumstances following the dismissal of the earlier petition.

Prince @ Rajith Prince Vs The Sub Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 24/06/2021

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.7174 of 2021

¶8

Prince @ Rajith Prince

¶9

Brisil @ Rajith Pricil ... Petitioners/A1 & A2

¶10

¶11

State rep by its The Sub Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. Crime No. 99 of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Ramakrishna Dass N.S.,

¶13

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶15

PRAYER :-

¶16

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.99 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioners/A.1 and A.2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 342, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C., in Cr.No.99 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶19

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record.

¶20

This is the second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4078 of 2021 was dismissed on 19.04.2021, giving elaborate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ reasons. Since the dismissal of the earlier anticipatory bail petition, there is no change of circumstances. Therefore, this Court

¶21

¶22

is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

24/06/2021

¶25

/ TRUE COPY /

¶26

/ /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

SSL

¶28

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶29

¶30

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHUKADAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶31

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

ORDER IN

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.7174 of 2021

¶34

Date : 24/06/2021

¶35

VB/MNR/SAR.IV/29.06.2021/2P/3C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prince @ Rajith Prince v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prince @ Rajith Prince v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajaguru Vs The Inspector of Police

K.Mareeshwaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajeshkumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Malliga Vs The Inspector of Police

Ashok Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

V.Villayutham Vs The Inspector of Police