Allowed

Yashar Arapath v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Jun 2021CRL OP(MD)/7042/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted bail to Yashar Arapath, accused under the NDPS Act for possession of cannabis. He was released on executing his own bond and those of two sureties, surrendering within a month, depositing money in the CMPRF, and appearing for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on executing his own bond of Rs. 50,000 and surrendering within one month; directed to deposit Rs. 1,000 in CMPRF.

Yashar Arapath Vs The Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 02/06/2021

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.7042 of 2021

¶8

Yashar Arapath ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶9

¶10

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kaliyakavilai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. Cr.No. 154 of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.Kameswaran S, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanickam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.154 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶14

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.04.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in crime No.154 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police has recovered the contraband from the petitioner and found that 1 ¼ kg of cannabis. Hence, the complaint.

¶17

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶18

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the respondent police has recovered the contraband from the petitioner and found that 1 ¼ kg of cannabis.

¶19

¶20

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain conditions.

¶21

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) before the Jail Authority. The petitioner after his release shall surrender before the concerned Judicial Magistrate voluntarily on any working day within a period of one month from the date of resumption of regular work in the Subordinate Courts and execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

¶22

i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity

¶23

(ii) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs .1,000/(Rupees One Thousand only) to the credit of Government of Tamil Nadu, CMPRF in IOB, Secretariat Branch, Chennai-9 (Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFSC Code: IOBA0001172), within a period of two weeks without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court;

¶24

iii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶25

iv)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness. v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

¶26

vi)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶27

vii)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶28

/ TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶29

KMM

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct

¶31

¶32

copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶33

¶34

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, KUZHITHURAI. 2. THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, NAGERCOIL SUB JAIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIYAKAVILAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. COPY TO THE OFFICER INCHARGE, CHIEF MINISTER PUBLIC RELIEF FUND, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-9. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7042 of 2021 Date : 02/06/2021 VB VR SAR 1 (02/06/2021) 3P / 7C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Yashar Arapath v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashar Arapath v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giri Ram.J Vs The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise

P.Venkatachalam Vs The Inspector of Police

Packirisamy Vs The Inspector of Police

L.Kaandeeban Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Govindasamy(mani) @ Govindasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Samayamuthu Vs The Inspector of Police