A criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner through virtual mode during the COVID-19 lockdown.
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6349 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6349 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.3664 & 3665 of 2021
K.Boomi ... Petitioner / Accused No.1
(In crime No.7 of 2012) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2. Monthai Ambalam ... 2nd Respondent/ De facto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.10 of 2014, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhunagar District, Srivilliputhur insofar as the petitioner herein and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandkumar For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar Government Advocate (Criminal side)
O R D E R
When the case was called up for hearing in the morning, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and submitted that he wants to withdraw the case. Therefore, he was directed to send a memo regarding withdrawal through the chat box. Accordingly, he had sent a memo for withdrawal of the case. The said memo is recorded. Based on the memo, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS III)
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS
1/3
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6349 of 2021
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
| Order made in |
|---|
| Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6349 of 2021 |
| Dated |
| 17.06.2021 |
AS(28.06.2021) P 4C
2/3
K.Boomi
State represented by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Virudhunagar
Monthai Ambalam
SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
