Disposed

Lizee v. The Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Madras HC24 Jun 2021CRL OP(MD)/5318/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Original Petition sought a direction to register a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2018. The Court closed the petition, noting that approval was awaited for investigation under Section 17(A), and the petitioner was directed to approach the Director of Vigilance via RTI. No substantive order was passed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition was closed. The petitioner was directed to approach the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption via the Right to Information Act for any further information.

Lizee Vs The Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption — RTI and Transparency | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

No.293, MKN Road,

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.06.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD).5318 of 2021

Lizee,

W/o.Homerlal

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, No.293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai-16. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, No.210/1A Lurdu Annai Salai, Rajakkamangalam Road, Nagercoil-629 004. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the first respondent to register the case on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 02.03.2021 within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Government Advocate(Criminal Side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) replies to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the Prevention of Corruption (Amended ) Act, 2018, Section 17(A) there is a bar, which is extracted hereunder:-

¶17

17(A). Enquiry or Inquiy or investigation of offence relatable to recommendations made or decision taken by public servant in discharge of official function or duties.

¶18

(I) No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendations made or decision taken by such public https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

No.293, MKN Road,

¶21

servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval

¶22

“(A)In the case of person who is or was employed, at the time when the offence was alleged to have been committed, in connection with the affairs of the union, of that Government.

¶23

(b)in the case of a person who is or was employed, at the time when the offence was alleged to hav been committed, in connection with the affairs of a State of that Government.

¶24

(c)in the case of any other person, of the authority competent to remove him from his office, at the time when the offence was alleged to have been committed.''

¶25

Now, the petition copy along with related documents have been furnished by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner to the office of the learned Government Advocate as well as the respondents herein and the same was forwarded to the Inspector General of Registration, seeking for remarks and comments and the same is awaited. Only based on the remarks and comments, the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption can proceed with the case further.

¶26

2.In the present, the Criminal Original Petition shall be closed. If at all, the petitioner seeks any information, he can approach the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption regarding the same through the Right to Information Act.

¶27

3.Based on the submission of the learned Additional Public prosecutor, this petition is closed.

¶28

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

tta

¶32

Note :(i) In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/3

¶35

No.293, MKN Road,

¶36

To,

¶37

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.S.C.HEROLD SINGH, Advocate ( SR-20126[F] dated 24/06/2021 )

¶39

CRL.O.P(MD).5318 of 2021

¶40

24.06.2021

¶41

CN (02.07.2021) 3P 4C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

3/3

Lizee v. The Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lizee v. The Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.J.Christopher Signi Vs The Inspector of Police

M. Sri Ramar Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

C.Karthikeyan Vs T. Jacob Rajan

The Inspector of Police Vs Elangai Nathan @ Nathan @ Rajan @ Sindhu @ Ilango @ Sivalingam

Viswanathan Vs Shobana

David @ Lawrance David Vs the Inspector of Police