This petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Having been referred to mediation with interim protection, the petitioners took no steps to resolve the dispute over five months. The court denied bail due to this conduct. Nothing cited.
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL OP(MD). No.4256 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 22/09/2021
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
CRL OP(MD). No.4256 of 2021
Vs
The State Through The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Ramanathapuram. Crime No.17/2021. ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Muralitharan, Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For Intervenor : Mr.Balamuruga Pandi, Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 17 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.04.2021, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the matter may be referred to the Mediation for settling the issue. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the matter was also referred to the Mediation Centre and the interim protection was also granted.
1/2
CRL OP(MD). No.4256 of 2021
pending for the past about five months and it has not been listed for about five months.
sd/22/09/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, RAMANATHAPURAM.
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.M.MURALITHARAN, Advocate ( SR-6500[I] dated 22/09/2021 )
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.4256 of 2021 Date :22/09/2021 tta MS/JM/SAR-2/29.09.2021/2P.4C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when petitioners failed to resolve the issue after obtaining interim protection on grounds of possible settlement.
R.Babu Shanmugam
The State
B.PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
