Dismissed

Rakkammal v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC2 Mar 2021CRL OP(MD)/3235/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought police protection via a criminal original petition. The Court noted the connected representation is pending enquiry and directed the second respondent to dispose of that complaint within two weeks, thereby dismissing the petition without granting specific relief.

What did the court decide?

Second respondent directed to dispose of the pending criminal complaint within two weeks.

Rakkammal Vs The Superintendent of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3235 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.03.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3235 of 2021

¶5

Rakkammal

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. 1.The Superintendant of Police, O/o. The Superintendant of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶8

2.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Silaiman, Madurai District.

¶9

3.Vijayakumar ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection to the petitioner's life and limb for doing cultivation in the agriculture Land, based on the representation dated 17.02.2021 and the subsequent representation dated 20.02.2021.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. R.Erottuchamy, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection to the petitioner.

¶14

2.Mr.R.Erottuchamy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would contend that the representation submitted by the petitioner was registered in C.S.R. No.112 of 2021 and is pending for enquiry.

¶15

3.Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the second respondent is directed to dispose of C.S.R.No.112 of 2021, based on findings and on merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order / uploading of the order, after giving notice and sufficient opportunity to the third respondent.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3235 of 2021

¶19

4.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CSII)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

To 1.The Superintendant of Police, O/o. The Superintendant of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Silaiman, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.R.KARUNANIDHI, Advocate ( SR-8538[F] dated 03/03/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3235 of 2021 02.03.2021 DKS(CO) KB(25.03.2021) 2P 5C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

Rakkammal v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakkammal v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mariya Antony Vs The Superintendent of Police

Saroja Vs The Superintendent of police

Vijay Vs The Inspector of Police

Jothibasu Vs The Inspector of Police

Selvi Vs The Superintendent of Police

G.Siva Vs R.Gurusamy