Allowed

Muthuselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Mar 2021CRL OP(MD)/2875/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC, imposing conditions regarding execution of bail bond, appearance before the Magistrate within 15 days, and compliance with police interrogation requirements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on execution of bond with two sureties and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days; petition to be dismissed if conditions not met.

Muthuselvam Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.2875 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 01/03/2021

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.2875 of 2021

¶8

Muthuselvam ... Petitioner/Accused No.02

¶9

State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.33/2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ganeshkamu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶11

PRAYER :-

¶12

For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.33/2020 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶13

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶15

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii)of I.P.C., in Crime No.33 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

I had earlier granted relief to the petitioner vide order dated 23.01.2020 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1029 of 2020. It appears that the petitioner had not surrendered and executed sureties. Therefore, the order got itself worked out.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL OP(MD). No.2875 of 2021

¶20

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶21

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶22

sd/01/03/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM.

¶26

2.-DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶27

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶28

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

+1 CC to Mr.M.GANESH KAMU, Advocate ( SR-1595[I] dated 01/03/2021 )

¶30

ORDER IN

¶31

CRL OP(MD) No.2875 of 2021 Date :01/03/2021 PMU https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ AE/JC/SAR-II (08/03/2021) 2P / 6C

¶32

2/2

Muthuselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthuselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vidhya Vs Panjavarnam

A.Villava Rayan Vs N.Muruganandam IAS

Tvl.Coral Apparels Vs The Asst. Commissioner(St)

Muthuramalingam Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Abdul Gafoor Vs The Inspector of Police

Poolan @ Poologapandi Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police