Dismissed

Javid Miandad v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Sept 2021CRL OP(MD)/2694/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a criminal original petition filed by the petitioner to cancel bail granted to the accused in relation to a cheating case. The court held it was inclined to withdraw the bail but directed the police to expedite investigation and file a final report.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; police directed to expedite investigation and file final report.

Javid Miandad Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD)No.2694 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Date : 29.09.2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD)No.2694 of 2021

¶3

Javid Miandad ... Petitioner / Defacto Complainant

¶4

¶5

1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi East Police Station, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.39/2021) ... 1^st Respondent / Complainant 2.Pathrinath ... 2^nd Respondent / Accused

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Fazil Kirmani For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthilkumar,

¶7

Additional Public Prosecutor for R.1 No representation for R.2

¶8

PETITION Under Sec.439(2) of Cr.P.C

¶9

PRAYER :-

¶10

For Cancellation of Bail in Crime No.39 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶11

ORDER : The Court made the following order :

¶12

This criminal original petition is filed by the petitioner to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent / accused by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sivakasi, in Cr.M.P.No.336 of 2021, dated 09.02.2021.

¶13

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the accused has cheated him to the tune of Rs.29,48,350/- and he is having documents to establish the same. But those materials have not been placed before the trial Court and the trial Court has granted bail to the accused within 13 days, without any orders as to the recovery of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ money from the accused.

¶14

3.On the aforesaid grounds raised by the petitioner, this Court

¶15

CRL OP(MD)No.2694 of 2021

¶16

is not inclined to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent / accused. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. However, considering the quantum of amount involved and that though the occurrence had taken place in the year 2019, the case was registered in the month of January, 2021, the respondent police shall expedite the investigation and shall file the final report at the earliest.

¶17

sd/29/09/2021 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

/ /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. gk

¶19

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶20

¶21

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SIVAKASI. 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVAKASI EAST POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶22

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2694 of 2021 Date :29/09/2021

¶23

SB/JC/SAR-III/06.10.2021/2P/5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Javid Miandad v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Javid Miandad v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jothibaskaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Syed Mohammed Vs The Inspector of Police

Arunkumar Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Kannan Vs Kumaran

M.Kavitha Vs Karpagam

Duraikannu Vs Sasikumar