Dismissed

M.Mohanasundaram v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Sept 2021CRL OP(MD)/264/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, alleging a possibility of settlement to justify postponing a mediation referral. The Court denied bail, holding that the petitioner's delay in resolving the issue after obtaining interim protection warranted refusal.

What did the court decide?

Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed. Petitioner at liberty to file fresh application if advised.

M.Mohanasundaram Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.264 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶5

CRL OP(MD). No.264 of 2021

¶6

M.Mohanasundaram,

¶7

Kaleeswari, ... Petitioners/Accused

¶8

State rep by The Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.681 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶9

For Petitioner : M/s.Sevugaraja.R., Advocate.

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

For Intervener : Mr.S.Bharathi, Advocate

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.681 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.07.2021, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter may be referred to the Mediation for settling the issue. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the matter was also referred to the Mediation Centre and the interim protection was also granted.

¶17

After getting interim order from this Court, the petitioners https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ have not taken any steps to resolve the issues. The matter is kept

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL OP(MD). No.264 of 2021

¶20

pending for the past about six months and it has not been listed for about two months.

¶21

Considering the conduct of the petitioner in obtaining an interim order of protection by submitting that there is a possibility of settlement and thereafter not taking any steps to resolve the issue, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh application, if so advised.

sd/-

17/09/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2021

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶28

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶29

Madurai - 625 023.

¶30

ssb

¶31

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶32

¶33

The Inspector of Police,

¶34

Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai District.

¶35

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶36

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶37

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.264 of 2021 Date : 17/09/2021

¶38

TR/SKN/SAR-IV(27.09.2021) 2P 3C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

2/2

M.Mohanasundaram v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mohanasundaram v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naina Mohammed Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajapandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Shanmugam Vs The Inspector of Police

Durga Anu Devi Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Hari Vs Parthiban

M.Jafrar Ibrahim Vs The Inspector of Police