V.Raghavan v. The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of offences under Sections 498A and 406 of IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. The Court imposed standard bail conditions including reporting to police, not tampering with evidence, and appeared before the trial court within 15 days if arrested.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners released on bail pending surrender within 15 days of arrest or appearance, conditioned on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and adhering to reporting and non-interference co
What the court decided
CRL OP(MD)No.2191 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03.08.2021
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
CRL OP(MD)No.2191 of 2021
1.V.Raghavan 2.Pankajavalli ... Petitioners/Accused 1
Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station(AWPS), Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District.
In Crime No.1 of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners: Mr.S.Manikandan,
Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy
Government Advocate(Crl. side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners facing allegations of dowry harassment and criminal breach of trust.
Whether further bail conditions should be imposed under Section 438 Cr.P.C to prevent tampering and absconding.
Whether the petitioners should appear before the Judicial Magistrate within fifteen days if arrested.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Raghavan
- petitioner
Pankajavalli
- respondent
The State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court