Allowed

Arputharaj v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Dec 2021CRL OP(MD)/20319/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench granted anticipatory bail to the accused under Section 438 Cr.P.C. pending investigation for offences under sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) IPC, considering the acquittal of the injured and the petitioner's wife's pregnancy.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on execution of bond for Rs.10,000/ with two sureties; appearance before police once in fifteen days.

Arputharaj Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.20319 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 20/12/2021

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.20319 of 2021

¶8

Arputharaj ... Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶9

¶10

State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station, Thanjavur District. Cr.No.1028/2021. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sridhar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1028 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 324, 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.1028 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused had abused and assaulted the defacto complainant and criminally intimidated her and her father with dire consequence. Hence, the complaint.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is an innocent and not committed any such offence. Injured were discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the petitioner's wife is expecting delivery and so liberal condition may be imposed upon him. For which, he produced medical record of Primary Health Centre, Ammapet, Papanasam Taluk. Hence, prays to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ release him on anticipatory bail.

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.20319 of 2021

¶21

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the injured were discharged from the hospital.

¶22

5.Reading of the FIR shows that both the defacto complainant and this petitioner are close relatives and on 09.12.2021 at about 09.00PM, one Natesan has conducted ceremonies in his house. At that time, one Arockiyam, who is the petitioner was in drunken condition and created trouble and the same was questioned by the defacto complainant. Due to which, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and assaulted her father. In the occurrence, both the defacto complainant and her father sustained injuries and both were discharged from the hospital.

¶23

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, that the injured were discharged from the hospital, that the petitioner is not having any previous case and also considering his wife's pregnancy, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, Thanjavur District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned; and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police at 10.30 am once in fifteen days until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶25

8.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

20/12/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/3

¶32

CRL OP(MD). No.20319 of 2021

¶33

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶34

¶35

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶36

2 DO THORUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

¶37

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAPETTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶38

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.V.SRIDHAR, Advocate ( SR-9506[I] dated 20/12/2021 )

¶40

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20319 of 2021 Date :20/12/2021 RS/PN/SAR1(22.12.2021) 3P-6C

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

3/3

Arputharaj v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arputharaj v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmenthira, Vs the Inspector of Police

S. Rashiya, Vs the Inspector General of

[email protected] Vs the Inspector of Police

Solaimalai Vs The Inspector of Police

Allwin Vs The Inspector of Police

Nirmal Vs The Sub Inspector of Police