Petitioner sought direction to prevent police harassment under enquiry guise. Court disposed of petition directing police to follow D.K. Basu guidelines while relying on Section 482 CrPC.
Petitioner not to be harassed by police under guise of enquiry and police to follow D.K. Basu guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9 of 2021
P.Vasanth
/Vs./
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the first respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of an enquiry.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent No.1 : Mr.S.Chandra Sekar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The present petition is filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of an enquiry.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-)
1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9 of 2021
Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1. The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to Mr.P.BANU PRASATH, Advocate ( SR-4757[F] dated 12/02/2021 ) SM TE : 02/03/2021 : 2P/4C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9 of 2021 10.02.2021
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition filer is to be directed to follow DN Basu guidelines to prevent harassment under guise of enquiry
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.K.Basu Vs. State of West BengalReferred¶16
D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal AIR (1997) SC 610 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Vasanth
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi District
Shanmugaraj
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
