Petition sought withdrawal and transfer of a criminal case. Counsel submitted the matter was infructuous. Order dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.13986 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.O.P(MD)No.13986 of 2014 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014
K.Thilagavathy
: Petitioner/LW-9
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukottai District. [In Crime No.352 of 2009] ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Panneer 3.Moorthy 4.Singam @Singaravelan 5.Gangadharan 6.Raju @ Rajukumar 7.Chelladurai 8.Murugesan @ Murugan 9.Mari 10.Ravi @ Loganathan 11.Panchu @ Panchasaram 12.Siva @ Sivalingam ... Respondents 2 to 12/Accused Nos.3 to 13 13.The Government Advocate (Crl Side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. [R-13 suo motu impleaded vie order dated 23.07.2014] 14.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Home Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai. 15.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai -4. 16.Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/3
Crl.O.P(MD)No.13986 of 2014
17.Law Commission of India, New Delhi. :Respondents
[R-14 to R17 were suo-motu impleaded vide order dated 25.08.2014]
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in S.C.No.152 of 2011 pending on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and to transfer the same to the file of any other competent Court in any other district.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi, Nos.1,13 to 15 Standing Counsel for the State For Respondent : Mr.T.Vadivelan Nos.2 and 6 For Respondent : No appearance Nos.3 to 5 & 7 to 12
ORDER
This criminal original petition is filed seeking for a direction to withdraw the case in S.C.No.152 of 2011 from the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and to transfer the same to the file of any other competent Court.
2.Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this petition has become infructuous and he also undertook to circulate a letter to the Registry to that effect.
3.In view of the submission of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
dsk
NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
2/3
Crl.O.P(MD)No.13986 of 2014
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukottai District.
3.The Home Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai. 4.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai -4.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.13986 of 2014 25.06.2021
SRK(CO) TR(08.07.2021) 3P 8C
3/3
K.Thilagavathy
Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukottai District
B. Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
