Dismissed

P.Jeyaseelan v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Sept 2021CRL OP(MD)/10496/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two criminal original petitions for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC were pending. The Court noted that the police had conducted a preliminary inquiry based on a complaint but subsequently closed the case. Consequently, the Court closed the petitions as no further order was necessary.

What did the court decide?

The criminal original petitions were closed with the direction that no further order is necessary.

P.Jeyaseelan Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). Nos.10496 and 10526 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/09/2021

¶3

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD). Nos.10496 and 10526 of 2021

¶4

Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10496 of 2021

¶5

P.Jeyaseelan,

¶6

J.Hemalatha,

¶7

J.Swathi ... Petitioners / Accused Rank Not Known

¶8

¶9

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶10

(In Cr.No.Not Known of 2021) ... Respondent / Complainant Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10526 of 2021

¶11

J.Vengateshwaran, ... Petitioner / Accused Rank Not Known Vs

¶12

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

(In Cr.No.Not Known of 2021) ... Respondent / Complainant

¶14

For Petitioners : M/s.Anto Prince G, Advocate.

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶17

PRAYER :-

¶18

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶19

COMMON ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 498(A) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act,

¶21

CRL OP(MD). Nos.10496 and 10526 of 2021

¶22

1961, in Crime No.Not Known of 2021 seek anticipatory bail.

¶23

It is reported by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the respondent police has conducted a petition enquiry as against the petitioners and thereafter, the same has also been closed.

¶24

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), the Criminal Original Petitions are closed, as no further order is necessary.

¶25

sd/27/09/2021

¶26

/ TRUE COPY /

¶27

/ /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶28

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶29

OGY

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVANTHIPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶33

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶34

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10496 of 2021 Date :27/09/2021

¶35

SB/JC/SAR-IV/06.10.2021/2P/3C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Jeyaseelan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Jeyaseelan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Eswari Vs The Inspector of Police

M. Muthukutty Vs The inspector of Police

Senthil Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Nallammal Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Gowrisankar Vs The Inspector of Police