Petitioner sought direction against alleged police harassment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court recorded submissions that under-lying complaint was closed/mediated and disposed of the petition without hearing advocates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10067 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :24.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10067 of 2021
Alamelu ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madurai City (Law and Order), Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai South,
Madurai.
3.Aishwarya ... Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to directing that the first respondent police to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.07.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.M.Veeranthiran
Governement Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.M.Sarangan for R3
O R D E R
The petitioner alleges harassment at the hands of the respondent police. This Criminal Original Petition came to be filed.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that the complaint given by the third respondent against the petitioner was enquired into and has since been closed.
3. The petitioner's counsel states that the matter was referred to mediation and the issue was compromised between the parties.
4. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CRL)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
csm/mga
1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10067 of 2021
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madurai City (Law and Order), Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai South, Madurai.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10067 of 2021
24.11.2021
RS (04.12.2021) 2P 4C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction against harassment by the respondent police.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alamelu
Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madurai City (Law and Order), Madurai
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai South, Madurai
Aishwarya
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
