K.Murugammal v. the Commissioner of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction to police to include Section 494 IPC in investigation under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court recorded submission that sections were altered, thereby closing the petition.
What did the court decide?
None granted; petition closed upon recording of submission that sections were included.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.9978 of 2021
K.Murugammal ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai Police,
No.132, Commissioner Office Building,
EVK Sampath Road, Vepery,
Chennai – 600 007.
- The Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram, Puzhal,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Murugammal
- respondent
The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court