Karthik v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted bail to the petitioner, a driver charged with transporting unlicensed PDS rice, subject to conditions including daily police reporting and a bond.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail by executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 25.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.968 of 2021
Karthik,
... Petitioner
Vs.
The State Rep. by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police Station, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri Dt. (Crime No.96 of 2020)
... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.96 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr. M.Jayachandran
For Respondent : Mrs.M. Prabhavathi, Addl. Public Prosecutor
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who is a sole accused arrested for transporting unlicensed PDS rice, is eligible for bail?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karthik
- respondent
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police Station, Krishnagiri
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court