Dismissed

S.M.Nazar v. Public Prosecutor, Tiruvallur

Madras HC25 Jan 2021CRL OP/904/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to quash criminal proceedings. The court held that the grounds were factual and required evidence appreciation by the trial court, and thus interfered neither with the pending proceedings nor dismissed the petition with a direction to complete trial.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed; directions given to Court below to complete proceedings within three months.

S.M.Nazar Vs Public Prosecutor, Tiruvallur — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.01.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

CRL.O.P No.904 of 2021 and Crl.M.P Nos.569 & 571 of 2021 S.M.Nazar ...Petitioner Vs. Public Prosecutor, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur. ....Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records in C.C.No.2 of 2020, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur and quash the same.

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.N.R.Elango
Senior Counsel
for Mr.E.Raj Thilak
For Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.2 of 2020, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur and quash the same.

¶8

The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.

¶9

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in C.C.No.2 of 2020, on the file of the learned

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Principal District and Sessions Court, Tiruvallur District, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order . Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶12

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KP
To
1. Principal District and Sessions Court,
Tiruvallur District,
2.Public Prosecutor,
Tiruvallur District,
Tiruvallur.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P No.904 of 2021
VSN II(CO)
GN(18/02/2021)

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.M.Nazar v. Public Prosecutor, Tiruvallur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.M.Nazar v. Public Prosecutor, Tiruvallur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushothaman Vs State Rep.by

Dilbet Saravana Coumar Vs Dhanalakshmi

Senthamarai Vs Divya

Ravichandran @ Ari Vs State Rep by

Ananthan Vs the Inspector of Police

Raja Vs State Rep.by