M.Sudhakar v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment denies anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges for allegedly entering a police station, threatening officials, and abusing them in filthy language.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Original Petition No.656 of 2021 filed for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 21.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.656 of 2021
1.M.Sudhakar ... Petitioners 2.C.Murugan
Vs. The State represented by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Samalpatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No.2 of 2021)
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge to the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest concerned in Crime No.2 of 2021, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Samalpatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District, on such terms and conditions.
For Petitioners : Mr.C.Mariappan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan
Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 47, 294(b), 353 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.2 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners who allegedly entered a police station and threatened officials.
Whether the apprehension of arrest warrants the grant of anticipatory bail in view of allegations of abusing police officials.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.M.Sudhakar
- petitioner
2.C.Murugan
- respondent
The State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court