Dayalan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by a defacto complainant to quash proceedings against respondents 2 to 6, the High Court quashed the charge sheet as the petitioner stood against further steps against those accused.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings in C.C. No. 188 of 2019 pending with Learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Puducherry, quashed.
What the court decided
Crl.OP.No.6343 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.OP.No.6343 of 2021
Dayalan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. State Rep. by
The Station House Officer
Sedarapet Police Station
Sedarapet, Puducherry.
2. Rajaveny
3. Nagammal
4. Chandra @ Chandrampal
5. Elumalai
6. Arumugam @ Iyyanar ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and quash the charge sheet filed in C.C. No. 188 of 2019 filed by the Respondent pending on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Puducherry.
Page No.1/5
Crl.OP.No.6343 of 2021
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sreedhar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal proceeding should be quashed when the defacto complainant states that the accused persons are not inclined to be proceeded against.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dayalan
- respondent
State Rep. by The Station House Officer Sedarapet Police Station Sedarapet, Puducherry
- respondent
Rajaveny
- respondent
Nagammal
- respondent
Chandra @ Chandrampal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court