Disposed

Mohan v. State Rep.by Its

Madras HC16 Mar 2021CRL OP/5249/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.O.P. filed to recall a non-bailable warrant. The court accepted the petitioners' undertaking to appear regularly and directed them to approach the Principal Sessions Court within two weeks to recall the warrant on merits, leading to the disposal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to appear at trial court within two weeks and file petition to recall NBW on merits; Crl.O.P. disposed of.

Mohan Vs State Rep.by Its — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED 16.03.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021
1. Mohan
2. Shanmugam
3. Balasubramaniyam
4. Murugesan .. Petitioners
Vs.
1. State rep. by
The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Omalur,
Salem District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Thirumangalam Police Station,
Salem District
Crime No.449 of 2020 .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem to recall the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the petitioners in Spl.SC.No.1 of 2021 dated 22.02.2021 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, R1 Additional Public Prosecutor

¶9

Page 1 of 4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶11

Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to recall the non

¶14

bailable warrant issued by the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem against the petitioners in Spl.SC.No.1 of 2021.

¶15

The petitioners are arrayed as accused 1 to 4 in Spl.SC.No.1 of

¶16

2021, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC read with Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act 2015.

¶17

The petitioners were absent during the trial in Spl.SC.No.1 of 2021

¶18

dated 22.02.2021 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem. Therefore, non bailable warrant came to be issued on 22.02.2021.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners undertake that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below regularly on all future

¶20

hearing dates without fail.

¶21

Page 2 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶23

Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021

¶24

Considering the undertaking given by the petitioners, the

¶25

petitioners are directed to appear before the learned Principal Sessions Court, Salem, within a period of two weeks from today and to file a petition to recall the NBW issued against them. The concerned Court is directed to

¶26

consider the same on merits and pass orders on the same day.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
16.03.2021
Index :Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
Speaking/Non speaking order
rli

¶28

Page 3 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶30

Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021

¶31

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J

¶32

rli

¶33

¶34

The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Omalur,
Salem District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Thirumangalam Police Station,
Salem District.
3. The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem
4. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.5249 of 2021

¶35

16.03.2021

¶36

Page 4 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Mohan v. State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan v. State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.G.Narasimhan Vs The Superintendent of Police

G.Somu Vs State Rep by

Murugaiyan Vs State Rep.by

R.Arjun Vs State Rep.by

A.Rajappan, Aged 58 Years, Vs State Rep. by

T.K.Nawaz, Vs the Union of India Rep by