Disposed

Muthumani, Aged 53 Years, v. State Rep. by

Madras HC25 Oct 2021CRL OP/5186/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners filed a Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings. However, the Government Advocate submitted that the trial court had already acquitted the petitioners on 19.10.2019. The High Court recorded this submission and disposed of the petition as nothing further was required.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition disposed of on the grounds that the accused were already acquitted by the trial court.

Muthumani, Aged 53 Years, Vs State Rep. by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.10.2021

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

CRL.OP.No.5186 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.No.3854 of 2017

1.Muthumani

2.Madeshwaran

3.Sutha

...Petitioners

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Elachipalayam Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.258 of 2012)

¶12

M.Ramsamy ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, prayed to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.118 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Sessions Judge, Namakkal for the alleged offences under Section 148, 147, 447, 294(b), 506(ii) IPC and 3(1) of TNPPDL Act.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.118 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Sessions Judge, Namakkal.

¶16

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that the Principal District Sessions Judge, Namakkal vide order dated 19.10.2019, has acquitted the petitioners/accused from all the charges,

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication. He has also produced the copy of the order in S.C.No.118 of 2016.

¶19

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate and since the petitioners/accused have acquitted from all the charges, no further order is required in this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(Lok Adalat)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

rst

¶24

To:

¶25

The Inspector of Police, Elachipalayam Police Station, Namakkal District.

¶26

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras – 104.

¶27

CRL.OP.No.5186 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.No.3854 of 2017

¶28

GMR(CO) SU(10/11/2021)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthumani, Aged 53 Years, v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthumani, Aged 53 Years, v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arulmurugan Vs Tmt.Arulmani

Dr.Karthik, Aged 28 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Adhimoolam, Aged 42 Years, Vs the State Rep. by

Nithiya, Aged 39 Years, Vs State Rep. by Its

Vcan Network (P) Ltd. Vs State Rep.by

Selvaraj, Aged 38 Yrs Vs the State of Tamil Nadu