Mr.a.Mohan v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the trial court to complete the ongoing criminal trial within three months, dismissing the petition seeking quashing of proceedings due to delay misconceptions.
What did the court decide?
The trial Court is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CRL.O.P.No.4194 of 2016 and CRL.M.P.Nos.2179 and 2180 of 2016
A.Mohan S/o.Arumugam ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.
State Represented by Inspector of Police J-8 Neelangarai Police Station Neelangarai Kancheepuram District ... Respondent/Complainant
2.M.Chandran S/o.M.Marga Sahayam .... Respondent/Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.434 of 2013 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, Chennai and QUASH the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ranganathan
For Respondent-1: Mr.E.Rajthilak
Counsel for Government (Crl. Side) For Respondent-2: Mr.Prince Premkumar
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant 3 months to complete the pending criminal trial.
Whether to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.434 of 2013.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Mohan S/o.Arumugam
- respondent
State Represented by Inspector of Police J-8 Neelangarai
- respondent
M.Chandran S/o.M.Marga Sahayam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court