The High Court granted leave to the petitioner, who was the complainant in a Magistrate Court trial, to prefer an appeal against the order of acquittal of the respondent. The court was satisfied with the averments and arguable grounds prima facie presented by the counsel.
Leave is granted to file the Criminal Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.3676 of 2021 in Crl.A.SR.6614 of 2021
Crl.O.P.No.3676 of 2021 in Crl.A.SR.6614 of 2021
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
This petition is filed to grant special leave to the petitioner for preferring the above appeal against the judgment dated 31.12.2019 in C.C.No.7211 of 2002, on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
2.The petitioner/appellant herein is the complainant in C.C.No.7211 of 2002 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. After due enquiry, on 31.01.2019, the learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused/respondent. Against the said Judgment, the complainant has preferred the Appeal. Since it is Appeal against the acquittal, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to grant leave to file an appeal.
Crl.O.P.No.3676 of 2021 in Crl.A.SR.6614 of 2021
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
r n s
otherwise in order, and list the matter in the usual course.
r n s
25.02.2021
Crl.O.P.No.3676 of 2021 in
Crl.A.SR.6614 of 2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file an appeal against acquittal should be granted to the petitioner/complainant.
VELMURUGAN
P. VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
