Dismissed

Prabavathy, Aged 54 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 Dec 2021CRL OP/28759/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition as withdrawn. By virtue of merits of the petition, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. The petitioners were granted dispensation from personal appearance before the trial court except for specific procedural necessities.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Personal appearance of A2 and A7 dispensed with except for specific charges and cross-examination requirements.

Prabavathy, Aged 54 Years, Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 15.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

Crl. O.P. No.28759 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.Nos.16250 &16569 of 2017

¶6

1.Prabavathy 2.Balasubramani 3.Sivaraman

¶7

4.Jayaraman 5.Venkatachalam

¶8

6.Jayaraman

¶9

7.Vasantha

¶10

8.Thirumal

¶11

9.Panneer ...Petitioners/Accused 1 to 7,9,10

¶12

Vs.

¶13

The Inspector of Police, Kallavi Police Station Krishnagiri District.

¶14

Mr.S.Sathishkumar ...Respondents/Complainant/ Defacto Complainant

¶15

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code,praying to quash all the proceedings in C.C.No.117/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Uthankarai, Krishnagiri District.

¶16

For Petitioners : Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondents : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.side)for R1

¶17

Mr.K.Thiruvengadam for R2

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶22

At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to grant an order dispensing with the personal appearance of A2 and A7. Accordingly, the personal appearance of A2 and A7 before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or on any other date as may be required by the trial Court. They shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross examine the witnesses on the same day, when they are examined in Chief.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

nr/msv

¶27

¶28

The Inspector of Police, Kallavi Police Station Krishnagiri District.

¶29

The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

¶30

Crl. O.P. No.28759 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.Nos.16250 &16569 of 2017

¶31

NMI(CO) SU(12/01/2022)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prabavathy, Aged 54 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabavathy, Aged 54 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Owen Joseph Gilbanks, Vs Shanmugam

K.Kalappa, M/A-62 Vs S.Ramesh

G.Suchithra, Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Pushpa Vs G.Mahalakshmi

B.Venkatraman, 32 Yrs, Vs Statae Rep by

Roselin, Aged 36 Years, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police