S.Lakshmanan v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash proceedings, as the petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition and made an appropriate endorsement before the Court.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.27685 of 2018
S. Lakshmanan ... Petitioner/Accused 1
Vs.
- State rep.by the Inspector of Police, W31 All Women Police Station, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai. ...1st Respondent/Complainant
- P. Kaviya ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the record and quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.5 of 2015 for offences under section 294(b), 323, 498(A), 506(ii) of I.P.C.
For Petitioner : Mr.P. Sivamani
For 1st Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Lakshmanan
- respondent
State rep.by the Inspector of Police, W31 All Women Police Station, St Thomas Mount, Chennai
- respondent
P. Kaviya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court