J.Jebaselvi v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the accused land broker to deposit Rs.17,00,000 within six weeks to the credit of the trial court to satisfy a bail security condition, directing subsequent disbursement to the petitioner upon affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Directed the second respondent to deposit Rs.17,00,000 to the credit of Crime No.122 of 2018 within six weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.26237 of 2019
J. Jebaselvi W/o.Jebakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. State rep.by Inspector of Police, EDF-III Team 20, Central Crime Branch, Chennai – 600 007. 2. Jayasingh S/o Kosalram ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 439 (1) (b) of Cr.P.C, prayed to cancel the bail order dated 31.10.2018 in C.M.PNo.6103 of 2018 in Cr.No.122 of 2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur and direct the respondent police to secure the 2nd respondent, and commit the Accused No.7 in to custody.
For Petitioner : M/s Paul and Paul
For Respondent : Mr.C.E. Pratap
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This petition is filed to to cancel the bail order dated 31.10.2018 in C.M.PNo.6103 of 2018 in Cr.No.122 of 2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur and direct the respondent police to secure the 2nd respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail order should be cancelled given the high petitioner's failure to comply with the security deposit condition imposed by the lower court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J. Jebaselvi W/o. Jebakumar
- respondent
State rep. by Inspector of Police, EDF-III Team 20
- respondent
Jayasingh S/o Kosalram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court