The High Court dismissed a criminal original petition for quashing an FIR as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner via video conferencing.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:24.09.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Crl.O.P.No.24969 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.14405 of 2017
K.R.R.Aiyyappamani .. Petitioner/Accused
Vs
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in connection with F.I.R No.549 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as far as the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajarathinam
For R1 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner appeared through Video Conferencing and placed a request to withdraw the quash petition. On the basis of the said request, the present
Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
grs/kbs
To
Crl.O.P.No.24969 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.14405 of 2017
SJ(CO) SU(18/10/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.R. R. Aiyappamani
Inspector of Police, E-4, Abiramapuram Police Station
Director of Income Tax (Investigation)
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
