Dismissed

Bhoopesh Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement Rep by the Deputy Director

Madras HC1 Feb 2021CRL OP/24911/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to quash proceedings via Crl.O.P. No.24911 of 2018. The court dismissed the original petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, closing connected matters without adjudication on substantive legal grounds.

What did the court decide?

Original petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to raise points before trial court; connected Crl.M.Ps. closed.

Bhoopesh Kumar Jain Vs Directorate of Enforcement… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.24911 of 2018

¶6

and Crl.M.P.Nos.14066 & 14068 of 2018 Bhoopesh Kumar ..Petitioner/Accused - 2 Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, Represented by the Deputy Director, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, 2^nd and 3^rd Floor, No.84, Murugesa Naicker Office Complex, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006. .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Principle Sessions Court, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vasanth For Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Special Public Prosecutor ORDER [Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

¶7

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal original petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

In view of the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is given to the petitioner to raise all the points before the trial Court. Connected Crl.M.Ps. are closed.

¶10

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nsd
To
1.The Principal Sessions Judge,
(Special Court under the Prevention
of Money Laundering Act, 2002),
Chennai
2.The Deputy Director,
Directorate of Enforcement,
Government of India,
Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue,
2 nd and 3 rd Floor, No.84,
Murugesa Naicker Office Complex,
Greams Road, Thousand Lights,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai – 600 104.
NMI(CO)
SM/22/02/2021

¶11

Crl.O.P.No.24911 of 2018

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Bhoopesh Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement Rep by the Deputy Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhoopesh Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement Rep by the Deputy Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Bhavani Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

T.Meera Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

T.Gangadevi Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

M.v.Swaminathan Vs the Joint Director

K.Samynathan Vs the Superintendent of Police

D.Bhanumathi Vs the Deputy Director